More Blog Posts

• 2020:
• Laminar Slip Layer vs Turbulent No-Slip Layer: Change of Paradigm
• DFS: Change of Paradigm in CFD
• Prandtl’s Tripped Science vs Boeing Max
• Fundamentals of Aerodynamics by John D Anderson as Old Theory of Flight
• DFS vs standard CFD: Form vs Skin Friction Drag
• DFS as Leibniz Best Possible
• Boeing Flight Simulator?
• Automated Flight Based on Predictive Flight Simulation
• 2019:
• Can FAA Authorise a Commercial Airplane with Negative Longitudinal Stability?
• Boeing Halts Production of 737 Max
• True Explanation of Coanda Effect
• Prediction ve Prescription in CFD
• Flow Separation in RANS-LES vs DFS
• CFD State-of-the-Art/NASA 2030 Vision vs DFS
• The Difference between DFS and RANS-LES, DNS and DES
• The (Unphysical) Kutta Condition
• Role of Shear Layer: No-Slip vs Slip
• Bypass Transition from No-Slip Laminar Boundary Layer to Slip Boundary Condition
• Flying Impossible with Prandtl No-Slip Flow Separation
• Models of Flow Separation
• Update of New Theory of Flight
• By-Pass from Laminar No-Slip Boundary Layer to Slip without Layer
• How Big is Skin Friction?
• Solving the Clay Navier-Stokes Problem with Meaningless Mathematics?
• Breaking The Prandtl Spell: Do Not Trip!
• The Mystery of Skin Friction from Tripping Resolved
• How to Make CFD Truely Predictive: DFS
• Eco-Madness vs Flight Security?
• 2018:
• How far can a battery fly?
• Turbulence Riddle Solved by AI as Automated Computational Mathematical Modeling ACMM
• On Beauty in Physics: Euler’s Equations
• 2013-2017:
• Blog posts on flight theory
• 2012:
• Dec 19: Tornados and New Theory of Flight
• Dec 18: Separation in Slightly Viscous Flow
• Dec 15: New Theory vs Old Peer Review System
• Dec 8: New Theory of Flight and Practice
• Dec 8: New Theory for Wind Turbines
• Dec 6: Liberation from the Prandtl Spell 2
• Dec 5: Liberation from the Prandtl Spell 1
• Dec 1: Incorrect Explanation of Magnus Effect
• Nov 29: New Theory of Flight Submitted to JMFM
• Nov 22: Lift from Unsymmetric Attachment-Separation
• Nov 15: Lifting Line Theory Illposed
• Nov 8: Clarification by Dover
• Nov 7: Dover Pushed to Not Publish The Secret of Flight
• Nov 6: Otto Lilienthal: The Flying Man
• Oct 30: Making of the Prandtl Myth by John D Anderson
• Oct 17: The Enigma of the Aerofoil 3
• Oct 17: Letter to AIAA Journal Chief Editor into Waste Basket
• Oct 15: Lift (Not) Explained at National Air and Space Museum
  
• Oct 15: Feyerabend on the New Theory of Flight
• Oct 14: From Pessimism to Positivism in Aerodynamics/Science
• Oct 3: The Enigma of the Airfoil 2 
• Sept 27: Why Circulation Theory of Lift is Unphysical
• Sept 26: Incorrect Fundmentals of Aviation
• Sept 26: Letter to NASA Glenn Research Center
• Sept 25: NASA: What Keeps Airplanes in the Air?
• Sept 24: Direct Simulation of Flight Stability 
• Sept 24: New Theory of Flight vs Observation
• Sept 24: Aerodynamics Expertise Without Knowledge
• Sept 24: Pilots Fooled by Federal Aviation Adminstration
• Sept 23: Flight Theory of NSF GK-12 Aerodynamics Contradicted by NASA
• Sept 23: Unphysical AIAA Lift Theory
• Sept 22: AIAA Lift Theory Contradicted by NASA
• Sept 21 Aircraft Design Engineers Fooled by AIAA
• Sept 21: Von Karman on Incorrect KZ-theory of Lift
• Sept 19: Computation Connects Theory and Practice of Fluid Dynamics
• Sept 18 The Dusk of Fluid Dynamics
• Sept 18 Request for Re-Evaluation by AIAA of New Theory of Flight
• Sept 18: Kutta-Zhukovsky-Prandtl Devoid of Physics
• Sept 18: Hyperphysics: Bernoulli or Newton’s Law for Lift?
• Sept 18: Airbus: Free-Glide Approaches and Landing
• Sept 18: The Princeton Sailwing
• Sept 17: How to Answer a Question You Cannot Answer
• Sept 17: Empty Flight Theory at Boeing
• Sept 17: Incorrect Flight Theory in Flight and Motion Book
• Sept 17: Incorrect Flight Theory at Federal Aviation Adm
• Sept 17: Incorrect Flight Theory at the Smithsonian
• Sept 15: AIAA Defends Old Incorrect Theory of Flight 4
• Sept 13: AIAA Defends Old Incorrect Theory of Flight 3
• Sept 11: AIAA Defends Old Incorrect Theory of Flight 2
• Sept 11: AIAA Defends Old Incorrect Theory of Flight 1
• Sept 10: Burt Rutan and Scaled Composites: SpaceShipOne
• Sept 3: NASA: Predicting Stall of Wing Difficult
• Aug 31: The Secret of Flight to Appear on Dover
• Aug 23: 10 Bad Reasons for AIAA to Reject New Theory of Flight
• Aug 23: How to Read and Not Read an AIAA Referee Report
• Aug 22: Can You Make Your Opponent See the Light?
• Aug 22: Harsh Critique of AIAA by AIAA Journal Refree
• Aug 21: To Speak or Not To Speak (about theory of flight)
• Aug 21: Circulation Theory of Lift Not Physical
• Aug 20: Why Reject and Article with Interesting and Accurate Results?
• Aug 19: Can New Theory of Flight be Retrogressive?
• Aug 19: AIAA Dismisses Critique of Classical Flight Theory as Mathphobia
• Aug 18: 10 Good Reasons for AIAA to Publish New Theory of Flight
• Aug 18: AIAA Power Play: Risky
• Aug 18: An AIAA Dilemma
• Aug 17: AIAA Asks KTH Aeronautics Professors to Respond
• Aug 17: KTH Aeronautics Professors Without Answers
• Aug 16: Analysis of AIAA Referee Reports: Reviewer 1
• Aug 15: Analysis of AIAA Referee Reports: Reviewer 2
• Aug 15: Analysis of AIAA Referee Reports 
• Aug 15: Langley Flying School: Theory of Flight as Triviality
• Aug 15: AIAA Rejects New Theory of Flight
• Aug 14: US Centennial of Flight Celebrated Dead Theory
• Aug 14: Kelvin’s Theorem Unphysical
• Aug 13: Non-Physical Principle of Winged Flight
• Aug 13: See How It Does Not Fly
• Aug 13: Science2.0 Tells How Airplanes Fly – The Non-Real Story
• Aug 13: Wiki Answers How Do Airplanes Fly? by Fooling
• Aug 13: Aerodynamics Education Collapsed
• Aug 13: How Things Don’t Work at U of South Carolina
• Aug 13: Teaching Teachers to Not Understand Flight
• Aug 12: Why is Yale Supporting Nonsense Teaching?
• Aug 12: ALLSTAR Network: How Airplanes Fly: Incorrect
• Aug 11: Theories of Flight and CO2 Global Warming: Similarities
• Aug 11: Why Is MIT Fooling Its Students?
• Aug 11: Why the Kutta Trick is Illegal
• Aug 11: Why Is NASA Fooling the American People?
• Aug 10: Text Book: Physics of Flight by Alfred Lande, 1946
• Aug 10: Text Book: Flight Physics by Torenbeek and Wittenberg
• Aug 9: Questions to KTH Aeronautical Experts
• Aug 8: Swedish Aerodynamics Dissident: Martin Ingelman-Sundberg
• Aug 8: Dead Science Cannot be Challenged
• Aug 7: Physics of Flight Reviewed by Klaus Weltner
• Aug 7: Text Book: The Simple Science of Flight
• Aug 6: Theory of Flight on Wikipedia
• Aug 5: Unphysical Circulation Theory
• Aug 5: Rounded or Sharp Trailing Edge?
• Aug 4: Text Book: Theory of Flight by von Mises
• Aug 2: Text Book: Not Understanding Flight
• Aug 2: Lift Not Generated by Circulation
• Aug 2: Text Book Theory of Flight: Schlichting 1979
• Aug 2: Text Book Theory of Flight: Kermode 2006
• July 29: Making of the Prandtl Myth by Prandtl
• July 27: Max Munk: Failure of German Flight Theory
• July 27: John D. Anderson’s Fundamentals of Aerodynamics
• July 27: AIAA Aircraft Design Confusion
• July 26: Flight Theory of the USA Airforce Academy
• July 23: The Enigma of the Airfoil
• July 22: Aerodynamics Text Book: Incorrect
• July 21: Early Developments of Aerodynamics: Incorrect
• July 20: Computational Fluid Dynamics as Paradigm Shift
• July 19: Philosophy of Science vs Science
• July 16: Birkhoff was Right: Prandtl was Wrong 
• July 15: Making of the Prandtl Myth by John D. Anderson
• July 14: Making of the Prandtl Myth by Schlichting
• July 7: Popper and the New Theory of Flight
• July 7: Kuhn and the New Theory of Flight
• June 22: Wikipedia on Lack of Theory of Flight
• June 21: Modern Fluid Dynamics as Pseudo-Science?